
In this episode, Caite & Michele are joined by a special guest, Dr Pip Coore of Hemmant's List, and discuss the recent decision of Lambourne v Marrable [2023] QSC 219 involving a dispute about the validity of the revocation of older and making of new enduring powers of attorney where a principal lost capacity and subsequently regained it.
In this chat, we talk about:
- The test of understanding the 'nature and effect' of the document, vs the transactions that the EPA permits
- The need of understanding of the full extent of assets and structures, or lack thereof
- The presumption of capacity under the new s111A Power of Attorney Act 1998 (Qld)
- The risk of personal liability for attorneys acting when capacity is in question (or indeed the regaining of capacity!)
- Key take aways for practitioners making/revoking EPAs and/or advising attorneys
You can (and should!) read the full case here.
Have a question or want to submit a case for discussion, send Caite & Michele an email at hello@theheirwaves.com.
Don't forget to subscribe for all the latest episodes!
See you next time on The Heir Waves.
** IMPORTANT NOTICE **
The information provided in this podcast is not to be construed as legal, tax or financial advice under any circumstances. The information provided is of a general nature. If you require help with a legal, tax or financial matter, contact your lawyer or advisor and obtain advice for your specific circumstances.
Comments (0)
To leave or reply to comments, please download free Podbean or
No Comments
To leave or reply to comments,
please download free Podbean App.